Family Tree

Family Tree

About Me

My photo
Kathmandu, Bagmati Zone, Nepal
I am Basan Shrestha from Kathmandu, Nepal. I use the term 'BASAN' as 'Balancing Actions for Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resources'. I am a Design, Monitoring & Evaluation professional. I hold 1) MSc in Regional and Rural Development Planning, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand, 2002; 2) MSc in Statistics, Tribhuvan University (TU), Kathmandu, Nepal, 1995; and 3) MA in Sociology, TU, 1997. I have more than 10 years of professional experience in socio-economic research, monitoring and documentation on agricultural and natural resource management. I had worked in Lumle Agricultural Research Centre, western Nepal from Nov. 1997 to Dec. 2000; CARE Nepal, mid-western Nepal from Mar. 2003 to June 2006 and WTLCP in far-western Nepal from June 2006 to Jan. 2011, Training Institute for Technical Instruction (TITI) from July to Sep 2011, UN Women Nepal from Sep to Dec 2011 and Mercy Corps Nepal from 24 Jan 2012 to 14 August 2016 and CAMRIS International in Nepal commencing 1 February 2017. I have published articles to my credit.

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Community Based Watershed Management: Factors Activating Users for Post-Project Management in the Western Hills of Nepal

Shrestha, B. (2008).  Community Based Watershed Management: Factors Activating Users for Post-Project Management in the Western Hills of Nepal. Lap Lambert Publishing House, Koeln, Germany.

Most often externally induced local institutions fail as the support is withdrawn. This poses what motivates users to continue managing the project support. This book examines organizational structure, function, internal resource and external linkage of project induced watershed management user groups. Collective action due to common interest leads to better participation of users in activating group functions including regular operation and maintenance. With such initiatives, the active user groups have accrued apparent benefits. Active groups have better training and exposures. The activeness of a group largely depends on how far its members benefit personally and directly from collective actions. The book concludes that the externally induced collective actions that cannot provide direct benefits will not be managed after the withdrawal of support. Users’ contribution to implementation and operation and their rights would enhance collective action and accrual of benefits. Linking the groups with local government, instituting multi-purpose groups and providing training would enhance the regular management of project support.

No comments:

Post a Comment